Re: Reactionaries (23/06/22 16:56:23)
I think the basis for a useful definition has to be a rather sweeping statement: Politicians are corrupt and/or crooks, and their most vocal followers are crooks or useful idiots. By corrupt I mean: Their personal interests are - to be honest - more important to them than the job they are in the position to do.
When this is the case, they cannot be progressives. When this is the case, they are against sharing money and power, or against decentralising money and power.
In my definition they are reactionaries.
e
|