Welcome to the php ebenezer's messageboard
see bottom for more info


Reactionaries (23/06/22 16:27:03)

    The Wikipedia article seems up-to-date with canonical


    reactionary movements and policies. But I'd say the Wikipedia article, for the practical purposes of today, is too narrow. I think we might come closer to a practically useful definition by looking at what I consider the opposite:


    "In the 21st century, a movement that identifies as progressive is "a social or political movement that aims to represent the interests of ordinary people through political change and the support of government actions"."

    I don't agree with that one either.


    I think we need a new set of definitions - useful as guiding principles of future policies and politics.


    I'll elaborate in another post - for fear that some edit glitch will take away all of the above - the foundation.

back to main board expand thread
Name email
Enter your message here :
Ask for confirmation if modified Are you not a spammer?
Show allowed tags
Show me the last post since :
local time shift :

come again

messageboard's PHP script is a courtesy of Laurent

 This board has been visited 258543 timesCurrent time is 15/08/22 07:09:25