|back to main board||collapse thread|
|Women (11/05/21 08:12:51)||Reply|
I think Donald Trump was the most forceful of my eye-openers. If someone had told me about him and his ways - and offered an accurate prediction - ten years ago, I would not have believed it.
|Let's start easily with the fine arts (15/05/21 21:20:12)||Reply|
(Wikipedia - fine arts)
Martha Argerich - I read a little about her about 1964, when she was in her mid-twentiesand I was just a low-teen-ager.
A few days ago I saw her on TV, playing a Beethoven piano concerto. Breathtaking - at 80 years.
She showed her talent before she was three, and her parents understood enough to put her into formal training at three. The rest is history.
So you might wish to look at the Wikipedia article.
So if there is talent, it could be a good idea to start early. But will there be afuture market for musicians twenty to eighty years from now? No bets. I'm too old.
|And a digression (16/05/21 21:15:31)||Reply|
Thereis some hope in spite of all the disasters happening.
|Re: Women (17/05/21 07:45:12)||Reply|
Henriette von Aigentler (1854-1938) approached him in an attempt of gaining entrance to such studies in order to become a teacher in mathematics and physics, and Boltzmann managed to persuade the system into accepting her. They married in 1876.
I think this story is telling about both of them.
The link below seems tobe about their correspondence. I haven't read it.
|A digression if I may, but not a battle of genders (22/05/21 20:47:28)||Reply|
Women had rough times, and obviously should be celebrated, after all, "L'Origine du monde" ce n'est pas?
One thing that I can't wrap my head around is the current climate around diversity, hiring quotas, and promoting women to "leadership positions" when the reality is that old white men, are and will be at the top. Hiring has been a checkbox political exercise, and meritocracy is failing at large, with some bad actors taking advantage of that.
As a real-world example I was in place(private company) where we HAD to hire women which compared to other candidates weren't as good, for the sake of quotas(I admit some fields are male-dominated)
I'm not sure how we got here, and what happened, but women were very prominent in science and tech: Ada Lovelace, Caroline Lucretia Herschel, Grace Hopper.
I just think that today we are treating the symptoms and not addressing a bigger and more profound root cause. On a positive note, I've seen an attempted pivot to try to engage women early in their formative years in school in those areas. Culture and education play a big part, and as somebody said, culture eats strategy for breakfast, so let's see what happens.
|Re: A digression if I may, but not a battle of genders (22/05/21 20:50:17)||Reply|
|This board has been visited 17512 times||Current time is 14/06/21 16:09:22|